Path 1 — Board Director
Whether you chair a board, sit as a director, or serve on the HR, compensation, or governance subcommittee -- every tool here is designed for directors and chairs, not consultants. If you hold accountability for people risk, succession, or leadership oversight alongside AI governance, this pathway covers both.
Assessments & diagnostics -- available now
Find out where your board's AI oversight actually stands. Thirty questions across six governance dimensions. Radar chart results with a dimension-by-dimension breakdown you can bring directly into a board discussion.
Take the assessment →A board-ready AI risk analysis generated directly from your assessment results. Section-by-section findings, governance gap analysis, and prioritized recommendations -- formatted for the boardroom, not a consulting deck.
Measure how your board actually decides today, before you change how it decides tomorrow -- a timestamped pre/post baseline tied to a specific intervention (a new AI tool, a governance policy, a process change). Particularly relevant now: Treasury Board's Directive on Automated Decision-Making compliance deadline landed June 24, 2026, and boards adopting AI-assisted decision tools need a defensible record of how decisions were made before and after.
Run the baseline →Advisory engagements -- available now
A full governance audit of your board's AI readiness, decision-making structures, and oversight capacity -- at a fraction of what Big Four firms charge, with no conflict of interest. We do not sell implementation services. We only evaluate and report. No Crown corporation or health authority in Atlantic Canada is directly bound by Treasury Board's Directive on Automated Decision-Making -- but as of June 24, 2026, that standard is enforceable in federal contexts, and auditors and plaintiffs' counsel don't need a sector-specific rule to ask why a provincial institution governed AI less rigorously than a federal one.
EY Canada fabricated 16 of 27 citations in a 2025 cybersecurity report. Deloitte refunded over AU$97,000 of its AU$440,000 government contract after fabricated citations surfaced. Industry estimates put initial Big Four AI governance engagements around US$500,000–$2 million, plus ongoing advisory fees. SPG offers independent, evidence-based audit at $12,500–$35,000 CAD with full source transparency.
In development -- join the priority list
Identify the strategic thinkers your succession plan is missing. A structured competency scan for boards and board HR/compensation committees conducting talent reviews, succession planning, or strategic hiring -- built around the five signals of high-leverage system leadership that standard job descriptions never surface. Especially relevant for directors accountable for leadership risk and executive succession at the board level.
A six-dimension diagnostic of how your board makes decisions under pressure -- Calibration, Disconfirmation Tolerance, Temporal Scope, Decoupling, Integration Time, and Resolve. Fourteen archetypes. Board-specific framing and benchmarks.
Board HR & Compensation Committee
The People & Leadership pathway has tools designed for exactly this oversight seat -- competency frameworks, succession-focused diagnostics, and intelligence-based talent evaluation instruments built to inform board-level decisions, not just HR operations.
Every week, Intelligence Atlantique surfaces the regulatory signals, governance rulings, and institutional moves that matter for board directors. Free. Bilingual. No filler -- every issue is built around one central signal with supporting context and curated additional signals.
Subscribe free →