Government-Ready AI Governance Assessment

Your Governance Report

Your report is only available during this session.

In respect of your organization's privacy, we do not retain your answers or results after this session. To return to this report, share it with your team, or review it with an advisor: save a copy now.

Choose “Save as PDF” in the print dialog.

Governance Maturity

0/160

Audit Readiness

0/56

What your scores say

Domain breakdown

Priority gaps and your first moves

Your three weakest domains, each with the first concrete move and a pointer on what good looks like. Treasury Board-flagged exposure is called out first.

Where to focus first

Your recommended sequence across all seven domains, weakest first. This is the order that buys the most governance ground for the effort.

The readiness test

“If an auditor general asked tomorrow to see how one AI-assisted decision was made, and to show that the person affected was told and could challenge it, could you, on paper?”

THE PLAN · Your 90 days

Days 1 to 30 · Stop the bleeding

Close the highest-risk gaps that would fail an FOI request or an audit tomorrow.
Stand up a single AI system inventory if you don't have one. You can't govern what you can't see.
Name the approval authority that signs off before any AI system goes live.

Days 31 to 60 · Build the spine

Put an impact assessment process in place, scaled to each system's impact level.
Set the transparency, explanation, and recourse practices citizens are owed.
Write the AI governance policy and get it board-approved.

Days 61 to 90 · Make it stick

Train the staff who use and oversee AI on the systems and their duties.
Set the reporting cadence to the governing body.
Run your first internal self-assessment and track findings to closure.

Treasury Board Directive alignment

Your Audit Readiness Score comes from 14 questions mapped to the Directive on Automated Decision-Making. This is the governance anchor your board needs.

Directive area	What it requires
Algorithmic Impact Assessment	Assess impact before a system goes into production.
Transparency & explanation	Tell affected people, and explain decisions in plain language.
Recourse	Give people a way to challenge an automated decision.
Testing & monitoring	Test for bias and data quality, then monitor in production.
Human intervention	Require human review scaled to the decision's impact.
Record keeping & peer review	Keep records that reconstruct decisions, and review systems independently.

This report points the way. A debrief walks it with you.

You now have your scores, your gaps, and the first move on each. A facilitated debrief goes further. It translates these results into your specific systems and context, names the two or three moves with the highest leverage for your organization, and turns the outline above into a 90-day plan your committee can actually run.

Book a department debrief →

90-minute working session · $950 CAD, credited toward a full engagement · For report holders

Implementation Advisory

Have us build it with you.

Your report identifies the gaps. A scoped implementation engagement closes them: AI governance policies, risk registers, audit trails, board reporting frameworks, and Treasury Board alignment documentation: built to your department's scale and political context.

Request a project proposal →

Scoped engagements for federal, provincial, and municipal organizations. Report holders may credit their debrief fee toward a full engagement.

This report reflects your self-assessed answers. It aligns with the Treasury Board Directive on Automated Decision-Making but does not certify compliance. SPG Research Group · pablo@spgresearch.com

Confirming your purchase...

We couldn't load your report